| Disability activism in the new media ecology: Campaigning strategies in the digital era C Pearson, F Trevisan Disability & society 30 (6), 924-940, 2015 | 118 | 2015 |
| Disability Rights Advocacy Online: Voice, Empowerment and Global Connectivity F Trevisan Taylor & Francis, 2016 | 109 | 2016 |
| E-cigarettes, a safer alternative for teenagers? A UK focus group study of teenagers' views S Hilton, H Weishaar, H Sweeting, F Trevisan, SV Katikireddi BMJ open 6 (11), e013271, 2016 | 72 | 2016 |
| Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in communication J Fox, KE Pearce, AL Massanari, JM Riles, Ł Szulc, YS Ranjit, F Trevisan, ... Journal of Communication 71 (5), 764-784, 2021 | 65 | 2021 |
| The Google voter: Search engines and elections in the new media ecology F Trevisan, A Hoskins, S Oates, D Mahlouly Information, Communication & Society 21 (1), 111-128, 2018 | 59 | 2018 |
| Researching protest on Facebook: developing an ethical stance for the study of Northern Irish flag protest pages P Reilly, F Trevisan Information, Communication & Society 19 (3), 419-435, 2016 | 58 | 2016 |
| Ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive issues online: lessons from the study of British disability dissent networks F Trevisan, P Reilly Information, Communication & Society 17 (9), 1131-1146, 2014 | 58 | 2014 |
| Crowd-sourced advocacy: Promoting disability rights through online storytelling F Trevisan Public relations inquiry 6 (2), 191-208, 2017 | 52 | 2017 |
| “Do You Want to Be a Well-Informed Citizen, or Do You Want to Be Sane?” Social Media, Disability, Mental Health, and Political Marginality F Trevisan Social Media+ Society 6 (1), 2056305120913909, 2020 | 37 | 2020 |
| Search engines: From social science objects to academic inquiry tools F Trevisan First Monday 19 (11), 2014 | 31 | 2014 |
| Making focus groups accessible and inclusive for people with communication disabilities: a research note F Trevisan Qualitative Research 21 (4), 619-627, 2021 | 25 | 2021 |
| ‘Maybe they should regulate them quite strictly until they know the true dangers’: a focus group study exploring UK adolescents’ views on e‐cigarette regulation H Weishaar, F Trevisan, S Hilton Addiction 111 (9), 1637-1645, 2016 | 25 | 2016 |
| Mobilizing personal narratives: The rise of digital “story banking” in US grassroots advocacy F Trevisan, B Bello, M Vaughan, A Vromen Journal of Information Technology & Politics 17 (2), 146-160, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
| Connective action mechanisms in a time of political turmoil: virtual disability rights protest at Donald Trump’s inauguration F Trevisan Australian Journal of Political Science 53 (1), 103-115, 2018 | 19 | 2018 |
| Towards a social justice disposition in communication and sport scholarship D Jackson, F Trevisan, E Pullen, M Silk Communication & Sport 8 (4-5), 435-451, 2020 | 17 | 2020 |
| Disabled people, digital campaigns and contentious politics: Upload successful or connection failed? F Trevisan The Media, Political Participation and Empowerment, 175-191, 2013 | 17 | 2013 |
| Scottish disability ogranizations and online media: A path to empowerment or" business or usual"? F Trevisan Disability Studies Quarterly, 2014 | 16 | 2014 |
| Using the Internet to mobilize marginalized groups: People with disabilities and digital campaign strategies in the 2016 US presidential election F Trevisan International Journal of Communication, 2019 | 12 | 2019 |
| Beyond accessibility: Exploring digital inclusivity in US progressive politics F Trevisan New Media & Society 24 (2), 496-513, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
| Technology and accessibility in global governance and human rights: the experience of disability rights advocates F Trevisan, DL Cogburn Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 18 (3), 377-391, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
Paul ReillySenior Lecturer in Communications, Media and Democracy, University of GlasgowVerified email at glasgow.ac.uk
